Archive for June, 2005

John Thune, Dan Nelson, Iowa AG, MetaBank, and personal connections

AMERICAblog brings to my attention this rapidly developing scandal involving South Dakota freshman Senator John Thune. Check out Clean Cut Kid and ThuneWatch for the full stories and background.

Essentially, it looks like Thune and Nelson are real close pals–so close that Nelson was Thune’s campaign for Congress in 1996. And he contributed a lot. And so did MetaBank, a newly emerging powerful bank in the Des Moines area.

In case you don’t know who Dan Nelson is, he was a slimy used car dealer who got big off of predatory lending and other illegal schemes that led the Iowa Attorney General, Tom Miller, to file a lawsuit against him in January of this year. Nelson soon declared bankruptcy, but not before ripping off a couple of close friends and hundreds of others across Iowa and the Midwest.

This is one hell of a big deal. Tom Miller is an amazing AG, always on the ball and on the big cases. I sure hope that his investigation and lawsuit take him into this territory and uncover an even bigger scandal between John Thune and Dan Nelson.

I’ll try to keep as update to date on this as possible. I’m gonna start prodding the Des Moines Register to do more tomorrow.

Shameless Plug Alert

Your humble magazine writer (dare I say co-editor?!?) will be in the nation’s capitol July 2nd - 9th participating in the Presidential Classroom program. Not only that, but I’m magazining (okay, blogging! I’m not afraid! :) ) it here.

I expect you all to be on your best behavior for Chris while I’m gone. Trite observations on the state of American politics can probably be expected upon my return.

CHRIS writes: I’d say your assistant managing-editor. I’ll be editor. Your posts are actually grounded, while I go off the deep end. We probably should create a masthead eventually. Google Inc. via Blogger will be official publishers.

CAFTA approved by Senate

This was expected. A 54-45 vote, definitely not down party lines.

These Democrats voted for the treaty (10): Bingaman (D-NM), Cantwell (D-WA), Carper (D-DE), Feinstein (D-CA), Lincoln (D-AR), Murray (D-WA), Nelson (D-FL), Nelson (D-NE), Pryor (D-AR), and Wyden (D-OR). Jeffords (I-VT) also voted for the bill, thus 11 essentially Democratic votes on to the bill. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) did not vote.

These Republicans voted against the treaty (12): Burns (R-MT), Collins (R-ME), Craig (R-ID), Crapo (R-ID), Enzi (R-WY), Graham (R-SC), Shelby (R-AL), Snowe (R-ME), Specter (R-PA), Thomas (R-WY), Thune (R-SD), Vitter (R-LA).

Quite an interesting breakdown, if you ask me. I expected Burns, Craig, Crapo, Enzi, and Thomas to all oppose the treaty. They have a substantial sugar beat industry in Idaho, Wyoming, and Montana. Same goes for Graham, Shelby, and Vitter. I was surprised we didn’t see those three Senators fellow Senators from their state choose to vote against it. The vote wasn’t as close as I expected.

As for the Democrats who voted for it, I’m quite disappointed. Don’t plan on receiving any contributions from me. Jeffords vote for the bill, to me, was the most suprising.

At least I can guarantee that the treaty will not be passed in the House. I’ll post more on this later, probably.

Bolton battle to rage on after the July 4th recess

That’s the truth, according to Steve Clemons, the leader on Bolton Nomination news.

Evidently the White House wants to get their butts kicked big time on this one.

Round 2 is gearing up

It seems that the RNC is still hell bent on getting some kind of Social Security action passed in Congress this term before they have to start running in the 2006 midterm elections.

Unless they can get this passed, it looks to be a miserable year campaigning-wise for Washington Republicans when they get back to their districts. Josh fills us in on the new RNC email sent out today. Maybe that’ll help them boost their polling numbers because they’re still operating under the crisis mentality that really isn’t there. I sure hope that There Is No Crisis comes back soon, BlogPAC really needs to bring them back.

The Des Moines Register just released an article quoting Chuck Grassley admitting that private accounts were a “short-term fix” but that it was still necessary. Someone please find me the logic in that statement.

But that’s not all Grassley was saying. He said that support among Senate Republicans was sketchy or timid at best. And then this from The Register:

“Grassley personally supports creation of the accounts along with a plan to solve the Social Security shortfall. But he said that as he works with committee Republicans, “I can say we’re doing very good on solvency but not very good on personal accounts.”

He said he might put forth a proposal as early as today if he can get dollar estimates on it and coax committee members into an agreement. Grassley did not offer details but has in the past seemed open to slowing the growth of benefits for wealthy and middle-class workers and has said that raising the retirement age must be a part of any package.”

So, the ball is still rolling–and getting much faster.

I’m contacting Rep. Boswell (my Congressman) in a few minutes to see where he stands on the issue in the House. You all should contact your reps as well and then communicate where they stand to Josh Marshall.

Should new legislative proposals begin to emerge, Democrats must be ready to yield no ground and to fight back. Pathetic politics should not be the strategy in this game.

Polls and lies

Oliver Willis fills us in.

Online magazines spread across the internets

It looks I’m among the first generation of an entirely new Internet writing system. And we’re getting big play time in the media.

CNN’s Inside the Blogs and MSNBC’s Connected Coast-to-Coast covered a lot of the blogs, especially Talk Left and a few others who will soon be joining my blogroll in the left column. Give them a visit, please. (The Talent Show blog online magazine has the CNN transcript here).

Anyway, I think this really is a good thing. First of all, it automatically gives us MSM credibility and that means we don’t have to criticize anyone and always talk about our great ethics. Secondly, we get to be real journalists who don’t have to fact check and are really great and stuff. Finally, we get to be part of the Gang of 500 and get talked about in The Note!

Ok, on the serious side now, it gets our point across to the FEC. We’re not playing games and neither should you. We’re serious about our causes–on both sides of the aisle–and individual political speech on the Internet shoudln’t be regulated, its just that plain and simple. Markos, Atrios, and Krempansky, as well as the thousands of other individual political commentators out there who sent in their comments or actually testified have stood up to the attempts to restrict our speech. And we can’t stop now. Whether or not this turns into a full-fledged movement is yet to be seen. Should the FEC inact regulations however, consider the online magazine a permanent response.

I agree with what Greg over at The Talent Show said:

“How would the FEC define “blog”? Like every other website you visit, this site is serving content via HTTP protocol on port 80. As far as the guts of the site, Movable Type considers itself a “publishing platform” these days. Like Slate, this site has multiple authors, covers a variety of topics, and updates sporadically throughout the day. If the FEC wants to draw a line between the online world and print, I’d love to see a comparison between the traffic statistics of NYTimes.com and the circulation numbers of The New York Times print version. Then again, the difference between whether or not I’m allowed to discuss politics could be as simple as not using the word “blog” anymore. Semantic restrictions are meaningless when you’re a template change away from avoiding legal scrutiny.”

These efforts are becoming meaningless. Sometimes groups like the FEC need to take the higher ground and worry about the real threats to fair political speech and campaign finance issues.

Maybe things like 527s. . .

International intelligence?

If Iran’s new President really was involved in the 1979 hostage situation, wouldn’t you think we’d have figured that out by now? I mean, aren’t our intelligence services supposed to be much better after 9/11? You would think that this information would come out before he was elected, especially if the US is so against him the way it is. Evidently not.

Impeach Bush? Yes, please

Evidently, a good number of Americans think it wouldn’t be a bad idea, according to a recent Zogby poll.

42% think if he lied, he should be held accountable that way. Only 41% of Americans thought that way when Clinton was impeached.

Makes ya think, doesn’t it?

What if Rehnquist … Doesn’t Retire?

But, but, but that would mean thosands of lobbyists and activists would have gotten all their hopes up for nothing! That would mean that all those media outlets were (God help us!) wrong! That would mean … that the phrase “lifetime appointment” actually means … FOR LIFE!

(Apologies for that sarcasm, now back to your regularly scheduled magazine programming)

Busy days ahead

The next two days of work are going to be quite busy, so don’t expect too many posts during the hours of 8 AM - 4 PM unless Chase decides to become a compulsive poster like myself.

Anywho, here are some great articles/posts that I think you guys should read today:

That’s it for now. Hopefully I’ll post more later.

And I’m thinking about making the transition from online magazine to blogazine–will the FEC find that acceptable or not?

Welcome to my blog online magazine

UPDATE: Welcome TalkLeft-ians and others, stick around and leave some comments or thoughts.


With the hub-bub over the recent FEC testimony and rules-chaning, I’m changing TPF into an online magazine. Entirely commentary, news, and features.

All of this spurred by The Talent Show, Atrios, AMERICAonlinemagazine, and others.

To understand Atrios’ new format, read here.

Welcome to my blog online magazine

UPDATE: Welcome TalkLeft-ians and others, stick around and leave some comments or thoughts.


With the hub-bub over the recent FEC testimony and rules-chaning, I’m changing TPF into an online magazine. Entirely commentary, news, and features.

All of this spurred by The Talent Show, Atrios, AMERICAonlinemagazine, and others.

To understand Atrios’ new format, read here.

Updates

So, things seem to be going smoothly with the new design, as far as I can tell. Only one complaint and that was about the blog showing up completely blank. I couldn’t solve that one, so I recommended Firefox. I assume that worked or the person just got tired of me.

Be sure to check out all of the new links in the left column, I try to read all of those blogs every couple of days, but sometimes friendly reminders are always good.

And finally, I’m going to be getting a new notebook computer soon (as in the end of July or early August). But I need some recommendations. And I can’t decide between a Mac or a PC. That’s where you guys come in.

Any recommendations for particular computers or pluses/minuses of certain systems? My range is anything less than $1250. Must have at least a 20gb HD, a fast processor, CD-RW and DVD-Rom Drive, and unless its a Mac, the ultrabright or natural bright screen. Thanks for all of your help.

Santorum feels the wrath of Harry Reid

Sen. Reid keeps throwing the punches. John has the details.


Subscribe

Subscribe to my RSS Feeds

Categories