Archive for September, 2006

Final Note, Part II

I wanted this to be done, but, I mean, wow–State 29’s “response“–concocted of ad hominem attacks, straw-man fallacies, red herrings, etc. make this all the more necessary.

It’s intriguing, being called a coward from someone who has comments disabled…I mean, is it fear? I’d ask, but hell, I don’t even know this guy’s name.

Attempting to find substance in his writing, he asks what’s conservative about slavery. What’s conservative? Maybe the belief that some people are inherently superior to others. The belief that the states should have been able to make slavery legal after the federal government declared it otherwise. I’m sorry I missed out, but I’m pretty sure that the southern states at the time of the American civil war were the conservative ones.

And he refuses to show any evidence that this action–undertaken at a point that is close to a major election in which the party in power has unbelievably low approval ratings–is necessary and warranted. Further, despite my repeated attempts to solicit proof that this measure would discourage voter fraud, I have only gotten a few stories about people being paid for votes. How’s a voter ID gonna prevent that?

Answers, my friend, you are short on.

A Final Note

In response to State 29:

You can mince facts and words all day long, but the fact of the matter is the Democrats used to be conservative and the Republicans used to be liberal. Thus, when you talk about poll taxes and who they were legislated by, you’re talking about people that today would be Republicans.

Not to mention it’s entirely irrelevent. House Republicans want to prevent people that mostly vote Democrat from voting, and it’s not fooling anyone who looks an inch deeper than the surface.

It’s a Great World

I must admit, where would we be without State 29’s historical inaccuracies and simple-minded remarks? You can’t tell me the world would be a better place, because isn’t ignorance and unintelligent debate a good thing?
Sure. The Democratic Party was responsible for oppressing African-Americans and refusing the the right to vote. In the 19th Century. But, as anyone who’s taken a high school American history course can tell you (take one, Mr. “State 29″) the Democratic Party and Republican Party switched ideologies during the 20th Century. Thus the era of the Southern Democrat ended and the Republicans started winning the southern states. Didn’t you ever think it odd that Abraham Lincoln was liberal?

Of course, State 29 offers anecdotal evidence that voter fraud has occured at some point in recent history. Convincing, unless you actually read it. The story linked to is actually about vote buying–Tell me, how do you expect photo ID’s to stop vote buying?

And his point regarding the free ID’s in Georgia completely ignores the lack of DMV’s in Atlanta and the fact that some people have to work when the DMV is open–especially if they have to work two jobs. Such is the lack of forethought on his part, but I suppose these things happen.

I’m waiting for actual answers to the problems with the Voter ID law.

Do you feel safer?

Well, if we didn’t have much else to add to the President’s list of accomplishments, here’s another one: Spy Agencies Say Iraq War Worsens Terror Threat - New York Times

IDP calls on Nussle and other GOP candidates to denounce smear attacks

I’m sure that this release from the Iowa Democratic Party will generate some interesting debate around the blogosphere.

IDP CHAIR CALLS ON NUSSLE, REPUBLICAN CANDIDATES TO DENOUNCE SMEAR TACTICS IN IOWA

“DES MOINES – In the wake of misleading and vile Republican campaign tactics that led a Republican candidate to leave the Party, Iowa Democratic Party Chair Sally Pederson called on Jim Nussle and Republican leaders today to denounce Republican smear tactics and the invasion of 527 groups in Iowa.

“Republican campaign tactics have hit a new low in the last couple weeks and it is time for Congressman Jim Nussle, who is running at the top of the ticket, to either embrace or reject this style of campaigning. As the candidate at the top of the ticket, it is Jim Nussle’s responsibility to call on Jeff Lamberti and Chris Rants to join him in denouncing these outside groups,” said Iowa Democratic Party Chair Sally Pederson.

Republican smear tactics in Iowa:

  • The Economic Freedom Fund, funded by the same person who funded last cycle’s Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, are now sending out mail across the state to help Jim Nussle. The group is also running attack ads, negative ads and push polls against Leonard Boswell. The Swift Boaters spent millions of dollars in 2004 to tarnish John Kerry’s military record.
  • A separate third-party group called the Iowa First Foundation is currently running misleading ads falsely accusing Culver of not protecting property rights. Culver supported the veto override of the eminent domain bill. The ad is false, and the organization does not disclose its donors. The founder of the group is former gubernatorial candidate Doug Gross, and the President of the group is Rich Schwarm, who David Yepsen said is “one of the few people Karl Rove has on speed dial.”
  • A Republican Party of Iowa mailing suggests Rep. Kurt Swaim of Bloomfield gave a sex offender a “sweet deal” while serving as a Public Defender. As the court appointed attorney, Swaim doesn’t get to choose his clients nor does he get to decide jail sentences or parole terms. In a public apology, Kevin Wiskus abandoned the Republican Party because of the “vile” and unauthorized attack.
  • A mailing sent from the Republican State Leadership Committee in Washington, DC against Rep. Dawn Pettengill of Mt. Auburn and Rep. Bob Kressig of Cedar Falls is completely false. The piece accuses Pettengill and Kressig of taking a vote in 2004 before they were even elected to the Legislature. Further, the piece claims they voted ‘no’ on a bill they voted ‘yes’ on in 2006.

“527s and shady 3rd-party groups have come in and are trying to hijack Iowa’s elections this cycle, and Jim Nussle’s own party’s tactics are so disgusting that a Republican candidate abandoned the Party to become an Independent,” said Pederson. “Congressman Nussle has two options. He can stand up and fight for clean and fair elections or he can sit back and watch these 527 groups and his own Republican Party destroy the fair and honest election process that Iowa has become famous for. As the leader of his party at the top of the ticket, it is up to Congressman Nussle to make that choice.”

Common Iowan has some more on the RPI smear that they’re sending on behalf of their candidates — with or without consultation. I don’t know if the IDP is doing the same kind of mailings, but I sure hope not or this release is kind of two-faced.

IA-03: Fallon critical of Boswell’s attack ad

Here I go to keep earning the reputation as Leonard Boswell’s biggest cheerleader on the blogosphere. Maybe that’s the case, but someone has to do it. We need more Democratic self-identification and Leonard Boswell is a proud Democrat. You may not like his message, but at least he’ll vote for someone other than a Republican for Speaker of the House.

Today, Ed Fallon sent an email out that talked about all the negative advertising going on, particularly on the Republican side of the aisle. But he made sure to make time to criticize Leonard Boswell as well. You can read Fallon’s full letter here at Common Iowan. Coincidently, Kyle posted today explaining how Boswell lost his vote (but Lamberti didn’t gain it) because of Boswell’s attack ad against Lamberti.

John Deeth’s got his thoughts on the issue here and I think he hits on the biggest point: Fallon’s gearing up for a challenge to Boswell in 2008 and he’s setting himself apart; he just happens to be doing it before Boswell’s even been re-elected. Now I’m sure Fallon and others will deny this, but this is the positioning I see and I know others do as well. The biggest problems I have are these two: 1) Fallon doesn’t need to set himself apart from Boswell, the differences are and will become quite clear; and 2) Fallon’s attacking Boswell before the primary season for 2008 even begins. So much for trying to be a team player.

Now maybe I’m being a bit harsh on Fallon. But there’s an expectation in a tough race like this that some of the torch-bearers in your party (and whether people believe it or not, Fallon carries weight with progressive Democrats and those who are unaffiliated) should do what he can to enhance your teammate, in this case Boswell, in a way that affirms the importance of his campaign and calls out the other parties for so virulently attacking Boswell.

Boswell is getting bombed at least three to one everyday by a combined attack from the EFF, the NRCC, and Lamberti. The NRCC and EFF had to change their ads for originally being misleading but Lamberti’s been able to keep his misleading one up (you can find the full release about the NRCC’s required changes below the fold). Boswell’s also getting hit from misleading and smear mailers from the EFF, of which a second one arrived to folks in the district today. And, as Kyle well knows, the EFF is behind the push-polling in the area against Boswell. It’s all in an effort to take this seat for Republicans, which we can’t allow. Kyle says things may not get worse with Lamberti as a representative but he’s dead wrong. Lamberti will stick with the Republican status quo and screw Iowans and Americans over just like they’ve been doing for so many years now.

Look, I don’t want this to be an attack on Ed Fallon or on Kyle. They’re both good people and have added a lot to the Democratic Party in this district and this state. And I think Fallon could do a lot to help in this race as well. He doesn’t like negative ads? Ok, go to the Boswell people and let them know that. Talk with them. Culver has sat down and listened to you, why wouldn’t you expect Boswell’s people to do the same? Fallon could set up an event touting a progressive agenda with Boswell and talk about how Boswell’s re-election will help in the effort to make Nancy Pelosi the highest ranking woman ever in American politics and will make her in charge of the Democratic and progressive mission in the House. Fallon could talk about the importance of taking back the House to bring health care for everyone in America, to protect our environment from deadly polluters, and how taking back the Congress could bring about meaningful discussion on campaign finance reform and voter-owned elections.

Instead, those on his email list get a critical comment about negative advertising when he needs Democratic support the most. Do you know what is worse than negative ads? Losing elections. We can’t let Boswell lose.

If you can’t win fair…

As today’s New York Times editorial notes, the House passed a Voter ID bill yesterday.

Thank you, Congressional Republicans, for proving an important point: The American public is right, you really are worthless.

Everyone worries about job stability, but members of the current Congress have much more reason to do so. With the way things are going, they certainly can’t afford to take chances with a good voter turnout. So what’s a House Republican to do?

Depress turnout! By adding barriers for voting, you can discourage people from voting. Never mind the fact that the director of elections for Georgia’s Secretary of State’s office was quoted in a NYT article as saying that they’ve never investigated a case where somebody was posing as another person in order to vote. Never mind that Voter ID bills (such as Georgia’s) have been struck down as violating Section II of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (if state Republicans can’t do it, Washington Republicans will do it for them.)

The fact of the matter is that while this law is facially neutral in terms of effects on voters, in effect it will discriminate against racial minorities, poorer voters, and both youth and elderly voters. For example, in Georgia, an identification card costs $20 for a 5-year ID and there is one facility in the city of Atlanta. For those who don’t have much expendable income and may rely on public transportation, there is no doubt this law is a great discouragement and obstacle to registration.

But, of course, this Congress was never much on substance and solution. So why win elections when you can prevent your opposition supporters from voting?

IA-Gov: New ads from Nussle and Culver

Chet Culver has a new ad, entitled “Running”, talking about Jim Nussle is running away from his record in Congress to hide the fact that he’s gone Washington. You can see the ad below:

He’s gone Washington. A great slogan, in my opinion. And I’m glad that he mentioned student aid cuts.

And in other news, here is Nussle’s new ad which goes for fear and smear.

It is the season of a negative ads so this is to be expected. Nussle’s digging down deep and pulling out every bit he can. Did some dumb stuff happen in the SoS office? Probably, no office is ever perfect. But at least Chet Culver can campaign on the fact that he didn’t leave a legacy of thousands of dollars of debt for every baby born in this country for the past few years.

Culver’s IPERS plan is a smart and strategic investment in Iowa, one even Nussle himself said was “a very prudent investment strategy.” Don’t get caught up in the Nussle Hustle. He’s gone Washington.

Common Iowan is right: Who do you trust with your financial security? I trust Chet Culver because he has a plan and he will invest in Iowa. Nussle decided to leave America bankrupt during his years of budget work. The choice is clear.

Off his rocker

Gavin is absolutely right. State 29 is off his rocker with his latest comments about Tom Harkin. Go read Gavin.

Now.

And Krusty isn’t any better. Harkin didn’t defend the speech in its entirety, as the Radio Iowa headline and story seems to imply. He said he understands the anger towards Bush’s policies. That’s a pretty weak statement of defense, if you ask me.

IA-01: Braley holds poll lead, but NRCC attacks for Whalen

I’ve neglected the Iowa Poll results that the Register reported on last week, but it is important that Bruce Braley is kicking butt in the 1st CD and is leaving Mike Whalen behind — Braley is 7 points up in their poll. Congressional Republicans are desperately trying to save this seat (as they’re desperately trying to take away the 3rd District from Democrats) and the Register profiles the NRCC’s involvement in the race. Essentially, they’re scrambling to attack him in every way possible. If you live in the 1st CD and would like to be a correspondent, please let me know, because I’d love to be able to follow this story just a bit more closely.

IA-Gov: Culver camp releases Nussle Hustle webad

Yesterday, the Chet Culver for Governor campaign released a webad on the Nussle Hustle meant for blogs and other sites to build an online community. From the release:

“Secretary of State Chet Culver’s gubernatorial campaign today released an internet ad educating voters about Congressman Jim Nussle’s recent “Nussle Hustle” regarding a woman’s right to make her own healthcare decisions. The web ad will allow the Culver campaign to tap into grassroots networks and online resources to spread the word about the “Nussle Hustle.””

Well, I’m going to work on spreading the word. Below is the ad. You can read the full script of the ad below the fold.


Oh, and Nussle took his 7th position on abortion yesterday. This is a complex hustle.

Continue reading ‘IA-Gov: Culver camp releases Nussle Hustle webad’

IA-03: Boswell gets hammered from 3 different GOP outlets

Leonard Boswell is getting hammered by the EFF, as has been well-documented on this site, and now the NRCC and Jeff Lamberti are jumping directly into the fray. If this doesn’t seem coordinated I don’t know what it’ll take ot convince you of the coordination. Just looking at the last 100 independent expenditures by campaign committees, it looks like the NRCC is trying hard to overcome the gap in the polls and save Jeff Lamberti. They’ve spent $111k on issue ad placement here in the district and they’re spending more to create new ads. And since the new ads went up, they’re now doing some internal polling for Lamberti to see if the coordinated ads (negative ones from the EFF, NRCC, and Lamberti) attacking Boswell will have any effect on the race in the polls (and we know they’ve taken at least one or two other internal polls in the district and haven’t released the results, meaning that they’re still down).

The ads, it seems, are in response to Boswell’s ad which criticizes Lamberti on his weak record keeping families safe. Boswell’s re-election campaign theme is “Protecting America’s Families.” The ad talks about Boswell’s strong security record in the first part. The second part of the ad highlights Lamberti’s weak record on crime and protecting Iowa’s families during his years in the Iowa State Senate. He voted against funding the Sexual Predator Registry Program back in 2000. He then worked to give a free pass to drug offenders by letting them serve probation instead of a prison term. When it came to convicted drug dealer felons, he reduced minimum sentencing requirements for the offenders. Boswell’s got a strong record on security and protecting Iowa’s families — particularly thanks to his work on the House Meth Caucus.

In other news, the Register finally decided to cover EFF ads, BUT they did it in a piece just talking about how Lamberti is getting a lot of help from national figures. They don’t do any investigative work and just report on what myself and other online outlets have already reported on about the EFF. Out-of-state 527s trying to play a role in these races — and 527s which are getting sued in other states — deserve to be investigated by the media in the district where they’re happening. It looks like in the interest of objective journalism, they decide to attach the Boswell campaign’s complaints with highlights of the attention that Lamberti’s campaign is receiving. Argh. I know a couple of journalism professor’s who’d find these actions just a bit wrong.

The Register and other 3rd CD newspapers should cover this story in-depth and with investigation. Please send them a letter to the editor.

IA-Gov: Someone has to campaign for Hanusa

So, with no one seeing Mary Ann Hanusa since Sept. 11 at the Healing Fields, Jim Nussle was forced to campaign for her in the Secretary of State race yesterday, as the Register notes here. Nussle essentially wants to make people pay to vote by having to prove who they are — a closet poll tax.

All I have to say about this is go read John Deeth’s post. All of it. Do it now.

Oh, and it was great to see in today’s paper that this story made the front page, went into the side, and when you finished and flipped the page, there was an AP article on another court striking down Georgia’s ID requirement. It would’ve been better if it was placed right next to the end of the article, but I’ll take what I can get.

IA HD-66: Political stunt

And to think that there might actually be a Democrat or two who think that Jack Whitver is a decent man. He’s nothing but a hack and KCCI bought into his political stunt.

What a jackass.

IA-03: Action Alert - Letter to editor campaign about EFF ads

As I’m sure most of you are aware, there was no report in today’s Register about the EFF ads. I know that a particular reporter is working on the story, but I don’t know when they’re planning on running with it or what they’re waiting for. There is plenty with which to write a story on right now.

But I digress. Since the media isn’t yet paying attention to the attack ads against Boswell (which were originally inaccurate and couldn’t be backed up) and are smearing him, we’re going to have to make them pay attention to us. The same guy who financed the smears of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth is now financing a smear campaign against Boswell. Online activists have to fight back.

Click here to use their online form to send a letter to the editor to the editor about the EFF ads or use this address to mail in a letter the old fashioned way:

Des Moines Register
Editorial Writers
P.O. Box 957
Des Moines, IA 50304

Use these posts (here, here, here, here, and here) to help set up some factual basis for the accusations against the EFF and the dirty work they’re doing for Lamberti. And you can use this research from the DCCC to defend Leonard Boswell:

Boswell Voted Against Making Permanent Tax Cuts Skewed to the Wealthy. The vote is against making the fiscally irresponsible 2001 Bush tax cuts permanent. In the first decade after 2012, the tax cuts would cost the Treasury approximately $4 trillion. When it is fully phased in, the cost of the tax cuts over the next 75 years will be more than twice as great as the entire 75-year shortfall projected in the Social Security Trust Fund. Additionally, when all of the enacted tax cuts are fully in effect, the benefits will flow disproportionately to those with the highest incomes. The 1.3 million tax filers who make up the most affluent one percent of filers will receive more than one-third of the tax cuts. At the same time, the 1.3 million tax filers in this elite group will receive about twice as much in tax cuts as the 78 million low- and moderate-income filers who comprise the bottom 60 percent of filers. The proposal passed, 229-198. [HR 586, Vote #103, 4/18/02; Associated Press, 4/19/02; Center on Budget & Policy Priorities, “The Administration’s Proposal To Make The Tax Cut Permanent,” 4/16/02]

Boswell was voting to be fiscally responsible. That’s more than Jim Nussle, Jeff Lamberti, Tom Latham, Steve King, or many other Congressional Republicans can say. Boswell has consistently voted for tax cuts for working families, low-income Americans, military families, and others who deserve and need the relief. Not the richest of the rich in America. He’s everyday Iowan and he’s working to protect you and your family.

In other news, the EFF is working with the same media firm that helped produce and distribute the original Swift Boat ads. And Boswell and Lamberti are going to debate again on October 3rd live on TV for a debate sponsored by KCCI and the Register.

Please pass this post along to your friends and ask them to help out as well.


Subscribe

Subscribe to my RSS Feeds

Categories