Archive for July, 2007

We’re back

Sorry about the difficulties many of you likely saw over the last few days. I came down with a rough case of laryngitis that took me away from my computer and email access so I wasn’t able to be informed about a problem renewing my hosting account and domain name for the site. However, those issues should have been resolved and the site should be functioning completely normally. Let me know if you have any problems and I’ll try to rectify them.

Posting will resume again shortly.

Senate GOP Blocks Levin-Reed Again

Greg Sargent’s got the best write-up of the GOP blockage here.

And in response, Senate Maj. Leader Harry Reid has pulled the Defense Authorization bill and it appears that he won’t bring it back to the floor until he can be guaranteed an up-or-down vote on the Levin-Reed Amendment and three others that will be offered (Warner-Lugar, Salazar ISG, and Landrieu). Talk about playing hardball.

So much for journalistic standards

When discussing the news that Mitt Romney paid almost as much on for makeup as John Edwards did for a haircut, Marc Ambinder writes:

“There is a difference in the political reality: fairly or unfairly, a healthy chunk of the national political press corps doesn’t like John Edwards.

Fairly or unfairly, there’s also a difference in narrative timing: when the first quarter ended, the press was trying to bury Edwards. It’s not so much interested in burying Romney right now — many reporters think he’s the Republican frontrunner.”

First off, let me just say: What the fuck? Like him or not, but your personal opinion shouldn’t spur what you write about. That’s a core tenant of good journalism, no matter what anyone else says.

We talk about bias all the time, but since when does the media get to decide who the frontrunner in a presidential race is? Shouldn’t their be equity in coverage, or at least an attempt at equity? I’m sure context matters, but this is ridiculous.

Romney attempts to woo social conservatives

Just yesterday my colleague and friend Ben Weyl posted a story over at Iowa Independent about Mitt Romney’s lack of action to prevent porn being shown in Marriott Hotel’s while he was on the company’s board, and his current campaign stump rhetoric of attacking pornography in today’s society. The story has picked up some steam lately as its gotten coverage over at the Christian Broadcasting Network as well as by the Associated Press. As Ben noted, leading Iowa Christian leaders said that if the allegations and controversy were true it could be damaging to his Iowa campaign. He’s built a substantial lead here in the first state.

Earlier today, the campaign unveiled a new ad that derides the ocean of perversity, filth, and sludge in today’s society. Marc Ambinder has the video here (sorry, I won’t post Republican TV ads unless they’re horrible or funny or worth truly castigating).

I guess it just seems timely that as social conservatives are finding another reason to be wary of Romney, he puts up a new ad targeting their little pro-family hearts.

‘Destiny’ Supporters, Opponents Plan for Aftermath of Today’s Vote

The polls opened in Polk, Dallas and Warren counties Tuesday morning for residents to vote on a proposed local-option 1 percent sales tax increase that would boost funding for cultural amenities and trails while lowering property taxes in the tri-county region.

The plan, known as Project Destiny, was created by business leaders and local officials in the three counties along with commerce groups like the Greater Des Moines Partnership.  According to Cyndi Fisher of the supporting Yes To Destiny organization, if the Project Destiny proposal passes in all cities and communities in the tri-county region it would raise $75 million in its first year alone.  Should passage occur, the sales tax increase would take affect January 1, 2008.

However, opponents have put up a strong campaign against the Destiny project.  George Davey of the opposition group NoLocalOption.com launched his website to oppose the initiative because of the nature of the tax.  His group claims that the passage of Project Destiny would actually be an overall 17 percent  tax increase on residents in the three counties, via a 1 percent increase of the sales tax.  They argue that a sales tax increase is regressive and hurts low-income and poor citizens the most.  More generally, the burden of paying for the cultural improvements and property tax cuts would fall on the families who would be less likely to benefit from property tax cuts, as they are not likely to be property owners.

The opposition seems to be making the stronger case to residents of Polk, Dallas and Warren counties, however.  A Des Moines Register Metro Poll conducted June 25 to 27 showed that 61 percent of those polled who were likely to vote today would be opposed to increasing the sales tax by 1 percent.  Thirty-two percent said they supported the plan, while 7 percent were unsure.

What remains to be seen are today’s election results.  In the three-county region, 41 of 46 communities will directly be voting on the 28E Agreement, which is Project Destiny.  The other five communities will be voting on something similar.  The 28E Agreement would create a 15-member board that would manage the Tri-County Regional Authority that would manage the sales tax revenue.

“A majority of the voters in the combined contiguous cities must approve the tax before any of the cities can collect it,” Fisher said.  “The tax is collected and redistributed only in the cities or in the unincorporated area of the county where a majority of voters have approved the local option sales tax.”

When asked what future plans existed should Project Destiny fail, Fisher said that community leaders and government officials would likely have a discussion after the election to consider the next steps.

Should Destiny pass, Davey and other opponents are not likely to mount any legal challenges.

“There are many legal issues which could stall implementation, but I would not have the resources to tackle that,” Davey said.  “More people would need to step up to the donation plate for this to happen.”

Davey also added that should only a few communities pass the increase, he expects Destiny supporters to attempt to have a new elections in those areas to seek success.

“We will be there to fight them all the way?” he said.

And should Destiny fail tonight?

“We believe our victory tomorrow will be viewed as a two-point takedown; next we plan to go for the pin.  If they bring it up we will fight it again, and it will be easier to fight it now because we are well organized now.  We also plan to work with the state lawmakers to shore up the local option law because we feel there should be a time-out period after defeat of three or four years.  We also feel they should be restricted to regular elections where voter turnout is higher and more representative of a democracy.”

Polls opened at 7 a.m. and close at 8 p.m. You can find a list of polling locations for your local precinct in Polk, Dallas and Warren counties here.

Ruth Harkin endorses Clinton

DesMoinesDem has the details over at Bleeding Heartland; Sen. Harkin is remaining neutral. Make sure to check out the comments for my take on the endorsement, as well as what I see developing over at Harkin Re-Election Campaign HQ.


Subscribe

Subscribe to my RSS Feeds

Categories